Anti capital punishment thesis
When someone murders someone else, the correct punishment is not to murder him or her, but to try and help them. It would appear to condone the crime by repeating it. It would be a wanton cruelty. The death penalty takes focus away from the victims and focuses the attention on the criminal. These are just some of the reasons the death penalty should be removed. There are of course many more. With the chance of being innocent, unjust, corrupt, what of the death penalty can be justified? I am strongly against the death penalty and what it stands for.
The death penalty is unjust and morally wrong. When someone murders someone else, the correct punishment is not to murder him or her, but to try and help them. It would appear to condone the crime by repeating it. It would be a wanton cruelty. The death penalty takes focus away from the victims and focuses the attention on the criminal. These are just some of the reasons the death penalty should be removed.
There are of course many more. With the chance of being innocent, unjust, corrupt, what of the death penalty can be justified? Also, if everyone witnessed the horrors of war there would probably be a lot more pacifists in the world. As far as the necessity of capital punishment, what defines need?
It has been proven that it does not deter criminals, therefore what other need could there possibly be? I think it is quite clear that the death penalty is anything but necessary. Another argument against the death penalty takes all of its justifications from the same book as an argument for the death penalty, the Bible.
The Case Against the Death Penalty
The most important difference between the Christian argument for capital punishment and the Christian argument against it is that the current stance of most branches of Christianity is that the death penalty is immoral. Again, there are many examples of this in the Bible. Using Bible quotes to argue for or against capital punishment is what Helen Prejean, author of Dead Man Walking, calls "biblical quarterbacking.
Instead of using quotes in the debate Prejean, and many Christian opponents, choose to use Jesus' teachings and their interpretation of them. Therefore, capital punishment contradicts almost all of these teachings, no matter how they are interpreted. There is no clause in the Bible that says "Love one another Criminals are no less human than free citizens are, and yet American society sees no problem with murdering them.
If this society can allow this what is to prevent us from being swayed into believing that blacks, Jews, or the poor are "lesser. But should she die, you shall give life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stroke for stroke. So, the passage may not give religious permission for capital punishment, but it is horribly sexist. One of the least often mentioned justifications for the immorality of the death penalty is the idea that it is, in fact, psychological torture.
American society has spent years making sure criminals are in as little physical pain as possible during their execution. On the other hand, the psychological pain the convict goes through in the days, months, or years leading up to their execution can be compared to no other, and can be described as nothing but torture.
Criminals sentenced to death spend the time leading up to their demise in what is commonly known as death row. Prisoners on death row live alone in very small cells, which they rarely leave, are allowed less visits than normal prisoners, and usually only interact with guards and other death row inmates. Death row was originally created in this manner because it was only planned to be a holding center for the short time between sentencing and execution.
As most Americans know, that short time can now be decades. Most death row inmates spend their time working on appeals. After appeals fall through, which the majority do, they begin vying for stays of execution. Most stays of execution also fall through. So what does all of this mean in real words, as opposed to prison talk? The prisoner spends his or her remaining time on earth fighting for their life in a cramped cell. Prisoners on death row get to know each other.
The Death Penalty: An Opinion Essay | quejetfiltleanon.gq
This, whether they know it or not, sets them up for more mental anguish. As they get to know each other better, they become friends through the walls. They share stories, memories, and ideas. This makes life on death row better, until the inevitable happens.
INTRODUCTION TO THE “MODERN ERA” OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE UNITED STATES
If two prisoners become close friends, one will eventually have to die first. The other is left with not only the knowledge that a good friend was just murdered, but he or she will soon be murdered as well. This brings up an interesting problem though, a prisoner of unsound mind can not be executed, so their psychosis delays their execution.
This is perhaps the most disturbing story related to that: "Henry McCracken, a condemned sex murderer, fell into a "self-induced hypnotic condition caused by fear of his impending execution He showed improvement, stopped imagining there were rabbits and cats in his cell, became neat in his personal habits, and began playing the guitar.
The successful treatment meant that the stay of execution must be removed; McCracken was sane and ready to be killed. These facts all but prove that capital punishment is psychological torture. Torture qualifies as cruel and unusual punishment, therefore the death penalty should probably be unconstitutional as well as immoral. Again, if most citizens knew of stories like the McCracken story, chances are there would be no death penalty. What if one condoned torture? If someone is able to accept capital punishment, his or her acceptance of torture is not terribly surprising.
The level of moral rationalization required to argue for torture is not much different than what is required to argue for capital punishment. Therefore, the response against torture would really no different than the response against capital punishment. Besides the debate over the morality of the death penalty there are questions concerning whether the death penalty is applied unfairly to blacks and the poor.
The current American justice systems makes every attempt to provide an unbiased trial, but it is impossible to provide equal justice for all defendants. This raises the question of whether the death penalty, the harshest of all punishments, should be an option in a system that discriminates.
There is almost concrete proof that the death penalty is applied more often to people of lesser income than more fortunate people are. The most recent, and high profile, example of this was the O. Simpson case.
- w s merwin essays on the poetry!
- Against Capital Punishment;
- Arguments against.
- argumentative essay internet dating.
- assess the significance essay?
- The Case Against the Death Penalty | American Civil Liberties Union.
- What our customers say;
The fact that the Los Angeles County District Attorney did not seek the death penalty in the case screamed inequity.