Gre essay section tips
I think you'll find it easier to just have 1 template in mind for each essay type. However, if I were to create a template to defend both sides, it might look like this:. Comment Policy: To create the best experience for visitors, all comments are reviewed to ensure they are relevant.
If your comment was not approved, it likely did not adhere to this guideline. To change the playback speed, click the settings icon on the right side of the video status bar. Have a suggestion to make the course even better? Email me today! This product is not endorsed or approved by ETS. Sign up to receive daily emails with various GRE practice questions. Each email is jam-packed with free video lessons, insightful articles, and useful GRE strategies to help you improve your score!
Thank You you guys are fountains of erudition and the best part of this is the fact that its free I learnt more for the AWA section than the paid guides I bought. Thank you so much for your Vahid Dehkordi - November 25, You are the best!
How to Write a Great GRE Argument Essay | The Princeton Review
King - December 25, Really great nilborundas - February 15, Most of us are habituated to write in bullet points. However, this section expects the response to be in the form of an essay. An essay is a group of paragraphs, structured logically where each paragraph flows into the next. Each paragraph is a set of sentences which again are connected in a logical manner. People often assume that using showy language, high-level of vocabulary and complex sentence structures will secure them a high score.
This is a misconception. It does not matter how complex the word is. What matters is the appropriateness of the word in the context. Similarly, writing complex sentences and confusing the reader does not fetch marks.
What matters more is how relevant and logical your ideas are and if they are being communicated effectively. If the context demands a complex sentence and a complex word, then so be it, but, force-fitting is not recommended. The second skill, which most students in fact ignore, is the typing skill. You are expected to type in about to words in 30 minutes, especially while you are framing the sentences in your mind. Your introduction paragraph needs to lay out the basic parts of the argument and let the reader know what the purpose of the essay is.
Your introduction should have these elements:. The body paragraphs of an argument essay should describe the assumptions necessary to the argument and then critique them. A good critique should reveal the weaknesses of the assumptions and also show how the argument could be strengthened. Argument essays do not require specific examples and in many cases, specific examples would be inappropriate.
Focus instead on dissecting the logic of the given argument. A body paragraph should have the following components:. All you have to do is make a final evaluation of the soundness of the argument. Before you leave your essay, spend one or two minutes proofreading your essay.reecomicco.tk
GRE Prep Online Guides and Tips
Make sure you have all the necessary parts of your essay and that your essay is free from grammatical and spelling errors. Correct any typographical errors. Now that you know how exactly you should structure your AWA essays, it is time to understand what a perfect essay looks like. In this chapter, we will discuss a couple of examples for perfect 6. This will give you a basic idea of the various key aspects of the AWA essays that you should include while writing. When individuals attain greatness, their achievements are more important than their personal faults.
While historians should not whitewash the personal foibles of great individuals, the impact that these mortals have had in their fields should tower over any personality defects.
To focus on the personal weaknesses of great individuals is to miss the importance of their achievements. The course of human history is decorated with individuals able to rise above their peers and reach the zenith in their fields. These individuals are often the subject of intense scrutiny from contemporaneous skeptics and later historians. But no one can lead an exemplary private life all the time; no human being is able to withstand such surveillance and historical scrutiny without personal faults coming to light. Great individuals are no exception.
However, it is misguided to focus on their personal faults rather than their achievements.
Analyze an issue
To do so is to miss the importance of their work, without which our culture would be worse off. For example, Abraham Lincoln was arguably one of the greatest Presidents the United States has ever had. He managed to bring the country through a substantial revolution and to end slavery despite powerful economic and social forces working against him day and night. However, Lincoln was not a saint. He was moody and prone to depressive funks that disrupted his family life and slowly eroded his marriage. These personal faults did not reduce his success as a President.
While we do not have to ignore questions about whether he was a depressive, we also should not consider them an important part of his political heritage. Criticisms of this sort are entirely relevant, whereas personal criticisms are not. Another example of a great individual dogged by criticism of his personal conduct is Albert Einstein. Einstein developed a number of the most important theories in modern physics, including an explanation of the photoelectric effect, an explanation of Brownian motion, special and general relativity, and Bose-Einstein quantum statistics.
However, Einstein also had life-long problems with infidelity. The fact that he cheated on his wife is in no way relevant to his accomplishments in the field of physics, and indeed most references to Einstein properly ignore it. To focus attention on the faults of his personal life is to obscure the impact he made on history.
Great individuals have personal faults, as all human beings do. We are better able to appreciate the gravity of great accomplishments when we are not burying our heads in the sand, in search of personal failings. The essay above deserves a perfect score, because it takes all the 7 major elements that graders look for, as we have already discussed in chapter 3: Clarity, Structure, Sentence Variety, Vocabulary, Grammar, Evidence, and Reasoning. The thesis provided by the student is very clear and concise. There is no confusion about which side the student took.
The issue essay tests how well we can present a position on an issue effectively and persuasively, and this essay passes both the tests. The piece is also very well organized.
Quality papers at the best prices
While the response included only two examples as opposed to the suggested three, the two examples presented are extremely strong. President Lincoln is an ideal case study of a leader whose greatness should be not be obscured by his domestic problems. The same can be said with Einstein; his infidelities may have wounded his family emotionally, but his contribution to modern science and technology will be remembered throughout the history of mankind. So, obviously, two of the most historic and the most apt examples were presented by the student here.
Additionally, the conclusion is substantial and does an excellent job of summing up the essay. The student uses a variety of sentences in order to make the conclusion unique, and not sounding too much like the introduction itself. The grammar and syntax are almost flawless, and it is hard to write a better essay response to this issue, in under 30 minutes. This electronic game rating system is not working because it is self-regulated and the fines for violating the rating system are nominal.
As a result an independent body should oversee the game industry and companies that knowingly violate the rating system should be prohibited from releasing a game for two years. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound. The argument claims that the electronic games rating system, although similar to the movie rating system, is not working because it is self-regulated and violation fines are nominal; Hence, the gaming rating system should be overseen by an independent body.
Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion relies on assumptions, for which there is no clear evidence. Therefore, the argument is rather weak, unconvincing, and has several flaws. First, the argument readily assumes that because the electronic game rating system is self-regulated, it is not working well. This statement is a stretch and not substantiated in any way. There are numerous examples in other areas of business or commerce, where the entities are self-regulated and rather successful. For instance, FIA, the Formula1 racing organization is self-regulated.
Yet, the sport is very popular and successful, drawing millions of spectators around the world each year. Tickets are rather expensive, races are shown on pay-per-view, and nearly all drivers are paid very well. Another example is the paralleled movie rating system that the argument mentions.
The author fails to clarify whether it is working well, but it is clear that the movie rating system is pretty well received by people, who often base their decisions to go see a movie with kids or not on the movie rating. It has never been a case when someone would feel cheated by the movie rating and express disappointment afterwards.
Since the movie rating system is also self-regulated, it follows that this regulatory method is working pretty well and it is not obvious how it can be the reason for the poor electronic game rating system. The argument would have been much clearer if it explicitly gave examples of how the self-regulatory system led to bad ratings and customer dissatisfaction.
Second, the argument claims that any violation fees for bad electronic game ratings are nominal. It thus suggests that this is yet another reason for the rating system not working. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between the monetary amount of the fines and the quality of the electronic game rating system.
In fact, the argument does not even draw a parallel with the mentioned movie rating system and its violation fines.